My laptop broke early last term. I
can't say it was a particularly frustrating experience; I keep my
most important files on USB sticks as well as the laptop's hard
drive, so I could plug one of those into my mother's (largely unused)
laptop and keep working while my machine was sent for repairs. My
internet activity was only slightly affected by the change in
machines, and if anything I did start working harder than before. For
a while, anyway.
The temporary loss of my laptop did,
however, remind me of how I spent quite a lot of my first year at
university: alone in a terraced house twenty minutes from campus,
without television or internet. Although I could easily make the
journey into uni, laptop in tow, and use one of the many wireless
internet networks available to access the various sites I typically
do of an evening at home, I was also rather lazy. Some nights, I'd be
in bed by seven or eight o' clock and just lie there, waiting to
drift off to sleep, instead of doing something productive.
I imagine things would've been
different if I had a phone that could access the net, or even had
some means of getting online instantly whenever I wanted, something
that I could just hook up to and lose myself in, or maybe something
inside my body that allowed access to the data-rich realm of the
internet with just a thought...
Where exactly is computer technology
going at the moment? The first computers were massive things that
filled rooms; now you can hold more power and memory than they had in
the palm of your hand. The market seems to be filling with
increasingly slim phones, tablets and notebooks; the room required in
a device for hardware appears to be decreasing, with large
(touch)screens being the primary reason for larger models to exist –
and even then, they still have thin profiles, if not always thinner
ones than in their previous incarnation.
To detour into the world of console
gaming for a moment, compare the size (specifically the thickness) of
the original Nintendo DS with its descendants; with the exception of
the 3DS and 3DS XL, which use rather new technology, almost every
incarnation of the platform has got thinner and more streamlined, its
applications more varied and its hardware capabilities more powerful
than the last. The wiring and circuitry of the DSi XL is pretty much
identical to that of the much smaller and more compact DSi, its
predecessor; it's a lot of hardware in a small space. And what of the
games themselves? Cartridge size decreased from Game Boy Color to
Game Boy Advance, and now more data than either of those carried –
for different graphics and means of gameplay – can be kept on what
amounts to a glorified SD card. Things have changed a lot in only a
few years.
I don't think it would be too great
a stretch of the imagination to say that eventually, technology might
get so small (and yet be so powerful and advanced) we wouldn't need
large screens to enjoy what it offers, at least not in the case of
the internet; the tech could just be implanted and integrated into
our bodies somehow, as in so many cyberpunk-inspired sf stories, and
the information would flash across our retinas whenever we wanted –
the ultimate hands-free experience – or we could dive into the net
itself for a time, leaving our bodies behind as our minds wonder.
Maybe this seems a little far-fetched right now, but who's to say
what the future might bring?
Would we let technology literally
become a part of ourselves, and have our bodies and minds be so
immersed in it? How long would it take for such technology to appear
and be accepted by society? What sort of ethical implications would
it have? Would it completely displace our current technology? If we
became dependent on it, what would we do if something went wrong with
it and we lost access to it, or it became faulty? What else might
change as a result of it? What alternatives to this might appear
instead?
There's a lot of questions
surrounding this sort of thing, hence its popularity in sf – the
's' stands for 'speculative' as well as 'science', after all. The
possibilities of technology have had massive impact on fiction for a
long time, and the relationship has proved reciprocal in the past. H.G. Wells
imagined something like the internet might appear, and lo, it did,
somewhat influenced by his ideas, if not necessarily in the exact
form he might have expected. Other technology might come about in a
similar way.
It's funny you should comment on how technology is evolving because I was thinking about this the other day. In the second episode of the Doctor Who reboot in 2005, Rose asks to be taken into the future one hundred years and the Doctor says that he can do that but it would be a bit boring and instead takes her to the last day of planet Earth. I disagree with this though, technology is a huge factor in the evolution of society, and a hundred years ago the technology was massively different. It's only just over a hundred years since the sinking of the Titanic and the technology upon that sole vessel is so completely different from what you would find on the equivalent today that 1500 people would have survived a devastating accident. One hundred years into our future can only bring the same discoveries. 2013 is a completely different world in terms of technology to 1913, it's a shame that likelihood is we won't get to see 2113, although with the evolution of technology who knows?
ReplyDelete